Options for Hybrid Expressivism
In contemporary metaethics, various versions of hybrid expressivism have been proposed according to which moral sentences express both non-cognitive attitudes and beliefs. One important advantage with such positions, its proponents argue, is that they, in contrast to pure expressivism, have a straig...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2015]
|
Dans: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Année: 2015, Volume: 18, Numéro: 1, Pages: 91-111 |
RelBib Classification: | NCA Éthique VA Philosophie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Metaethics
Hybrid expressivism
Frege-Geach problem
Internalism
Conventional implicature
Conversational implicature
|
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | In contemporary metaethics, various versions of hybrid expressivism have been proposed according to which moral sentences express both non-cognitive attitudes and beliefs. One important advantage with such positions, its proponents argue, is that they, in contrast to pure expressivism, have a straightforward way of avoiding the Frege-Geach problem. In this paper, I provide a systematic examination of different versions of hybrid expressivism with particular regard to how they are assumed to evade this problem. The major conclusion is that none of these views succeeds to provide both a fully satisfying interpretation of moral sentences and a convincing response to the Frege-Geach problem. I end by briefly considering alternative hybrid views that employ the notion of conventional or conversational implicature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-014-9511-2 |