Sextus and Wittgenstein on the End of Justification

Following the lead of Duncan Pritchard’s “Wittgensteinian Pyrrhonism,” this paper takes a further, comparative and contrastive look at the problem of justification in Sextus Empiricus and in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. I argue both that Pritchard’s stimulating account is problematic in certain impo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tor, Shaul (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2014
In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2014, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 81-108
Further subjects:B Sextus Pyrrhonism Wittgenstein On Certainty justification everyday action worldview
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562220705
003 DE-627
005 20220604142703.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22105700-03041125  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562220705 
035 |a (DE-576)492220700 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492220700 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Tor, Shaul  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sextus and Wittgenstein on the End of Justification 
264 1 |c 2014 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Following the lead of Duncan Pritchard’s “Wittgensteinian Pyrrhonism,” this paper takes a further, comparative and contrastive look at the problem of justification in Sextus Empiricus and in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. I argue both that Pritchard’s stimulating account is problematic in certain important respects and that his insights contain much interpretive potential still to be pursued. Diverging from Pritchard, I argue that it is a significant and self-conscious aspect of Sextus’ sceptical strategies to call into question large segments of our belief system en masse by exposing as apparently unjustifiable fundamental propositions which are closely related in their linchpin role to Wittgenstein’s hinge propositions. In the first instance, the result is a more complex account of both a deeper affinity between Wittgenstein’s approach to hinge propositions and Sextus’ approach to what I term archai propositions and a divergence between the two. In the second instance, I suggest how the comparison with On Certainty can be illuminating for the interpreter of Sextus. In particular, it can help us to see how the Pyrrhonist’s everyday conduct—common assumptions to the contrary notwithstanding—involves rational procedures of justification, in line with a naturalism reminiscent of Wittgenstein. Furthermore, it can help us to reflect on the Pyrrhonist’s attitude to what Wittgenstein would have called her ‘worldview’. Throughout, I suggest that the comparison with Wittgenstein is interesting, although it must be cashed out differently, not only on the interpretation—or, perhaps, strand—of ancient Pyrrhonism which has the sceptic exempt ordinary beliefs from her suspension of judgement, but also on the interpretation (or strand) which has her disavow all beliefs categorically. 
650 4 |a Sextus  |x Pyrrhonism  |x Wittgenstein  |x On Certainty  |x justification  |x everyday action  |x worldview 
773 0 8 |i In  |t International journal for the study of skepticism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |g 4(2014), 2, Seite 81-108  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)660812843  |w (DE-600)2610085-X  |w (DE-576)345005341  |x 2210-5700  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:4  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:81-108 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-03041125  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 4  |j 2014  |e 2  |h 81-108 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2977078142 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562220705 
LOK |0 005 20170808151618 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Sextus,Sixtus,Sixtus,Xistus,Sextus Pythagoraeus, Quintus,Pythagoraeus, Sextus