Religious Accommodation in the American Workplace
This article examines how the us Supreme Court’s decision in eeoc v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. represents a shift in the Court’s analysis in religious accommodation cases under §701(j) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As a result of this decision lower courts are now likely to provide gre...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
Journal of law, religion and state
Year: 2017, Volume: 5, Issue: 1, Pages: 25-47 |
| Further subjects: | B
Religion
religious accommodation
employment law
Title vii
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1562138693 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604142338.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22124810-00501002 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1562138693 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)492138699 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492138699 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kaminer, Debbie |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious Accommodation in the American Workplace |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article examines how the us Supreme Court’s decision in eeoc v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. represents a shift in the Court’s analysis in religious accommodation cases under §701(j) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As a result of this decision lower courts are now likely to provide greater protection to employees requesting accommodation under §701(j) for two reasons. First, Abercrombie held that an employer can be liable for religious discrimination even if it does not have “actual knowledge” of an applicant’s or employee’s need for religious accommodation. Additionally, the Court also determined that religious accommodation claims can be raised as disparate treatment claims, and in doing so emphasized for the first time that §701(j) mandates more than formal equality. This is an important shift since previous federal decisions often relied on formal equality in limiting an employer’s accommodation obligation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Religion |x religious accommodation |x employment law |x Title vii | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of law, religion and state |d Leiden : Brill, 2012 |g 5(2017), 1, Seite 25-47 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)796586713 |w (DE-600)2783973-4 |w (DE-576)414227638 |x 2212-4810 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:25-47 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22124810-00501002 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 5 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 25-47 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976995915 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1562138693 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808151345 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religions,Religion |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Religión,Religión,Religión |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Religione,Religione,Religione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Religião,Religião |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Религия,Религия (мотив) |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο) |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie |