Opposing Abortion, Gay Adoption, Euthanasia, and Suicide
In secularized modern Western societies, moral opposition to the liberalization of abortion, gay adoption, euthanasia, and suicide often relies on justifications based on other-oriented motives (mainly, protection of the weak, e.g., children). Moreover, some argue that the truly open-minded people m...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2015
|
| In: |
Archive for the psychology of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 37, Issue: 3, Pages: 267-294 |
| Further subjects: | B
moral opposition
conservatism
religion
prosociality
homosexuality
euthanasia
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1562091948 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604142134.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15736121-12341309 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1562091948 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)492091943 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492091943 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1113556315 |0 (DE-627)867471069 |0 (DE-576)476986613 |4 aut |a Deák, Csillag |d 1949- | |
| 109 | |a Deák, Csillag 1949- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Opposing Abortion, Gay Adoption, Euthanasia, and Suicide |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In secularized modern Western societies, moral opposition to the liberalization of abortion, gay adoption, euthanasia, and suicide often relies on justifications based on other-oriented motives (mainly, protection of the weak, e.g., children). Moreover, some argue that the truly open-minded people may be those who, against the stream, oppose the established dominant liberal values in modern societies. We investigated whether moral and religious opposition to, vs. the acceptance of, the above four issues, as well as the endorsement of respective con vs. pro arguments reflect (a) “compassionate openness” (prosocial, interpersonal, dispositions and existential flexibility), (b) “compassionate conservatism” (prosocial dispositions and collectivistic moral concerns), or (c) “self-centered moral rigorism” (collectivistic moral concerns, low existential quest, and low humility instead of prosocial dispositions). The results, to some extent, confirmed the third pattern. Thus, compassionate openness does not seem to underline modern moral opposition, possibly in contrast to some rhetoric of the latter. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a moral opposition |x conservatism |x religion |x prosociality |x homosexuality |x euthanasia | |
| 700 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1043607102 |0 (DE-627)770710735 |0 (DE-576)177403691 |4 aut |a Saroglou, Vassilis | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Archive for the psychology of religion |d London : SAGE Publishing, 1914 |g 37(2015), 3, Seite 267-294 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)48851584X |w (DE-600)2190527-7 |w (DE-576)118854089 |x 1573-6121 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:267-294 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15736121-12341309 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 37 |j 2015 |e 3 |h 267-294 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 297694900X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1562091948 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808151214 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||