Examining Special Patient Rituals in a Chinese Cultural Context: A Research Report

Is reasoning about religious ritual tethered to ordinary, nonreligious human reasoning about actions? E. Thomas Lawson and Robert N. McCauley’s ritual form hypothesis (rfh) constitutes a cognitive approach to religious ritual – an explanatory theory that suggests people use ordinary human cognition...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Hornbeck, Ryan G. 1981- (Auteur) ; Bentley, Brianna (Auteur) ; Barrett, Justin L. 1971- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2015
Dans: Journal of cognition and culture
Année: 2015, Volume: 15, Numéro: 5, Pages: 530-541
Sujets non-standardisés:B China cognitive science of religion Lawson and McCauley ritual form hypothesis Singapore
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:Is reasoning about religious ritual tethered to ordinary, nonreligious human reasoning about actions? E. Thomas Lawson and Robert N. McCauley’s ritual form hypothesis (rfh) constitutes a cognitive approach to religious ritual – an explanatory theory that suggests people use ordinary human cognition to make specific predictions about ritual properties, relatively independent of cultural or religious particulars. Few studies assess the credibility of rfh and further evidence is needed to generalize its predictions across cultures. Towards this end, we assessed culturally Chinese “special patient” rituals in Singapore. Our findings strongly support rfh predictions for special patient ritual repeatability, reversibility, sensory pageantry and emotionality.
ISSN:1568-5373
Contient:In: Journal of cognition and culture
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685373-12342164