A Clash of Legal Norms
This paper explores the reasons for proscribed sanctions and their effects on contemporary Ghana. I contend that the sacred office of the Ghanaian chief, which is legitimated by spiritual and legal norms, plays an ambivalent role in Ghana’s legal and political modernization. Using banishment as a ca...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2017
|
| Dans: |
Journal of law, religion and state
Année: 2017, Volume: 5, Numéro: 2, Pages: 87-116 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Ghana
chieftaincy
sovereignty
banishment
legal pluralism
customary law
human rights
legitimacy
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This paper explores the reasons for proscribed sanctions and their effects on contemporary Ghana. I contend that the sacred office of the Ghanaian chief, which is legitimated by spiritual and legal norms, plays an ambivalent role in Ghana’s legal and political modernization. Using banishment as a case study, the paper pays attentions to how the continued use of proscribed sanctions, among other chiefly actions, raises an ambivalent challenge to Ghana’s laws, its sovereignty, and its commitment to human rights. I propose actions that may aid the state in overcoming these challenges and successfully integrating modern norms with ancient traditional values. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2212-4810 |
| Contient: | In: Journal of law, religion and state
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22124810-00502001 |