The Breakdown of Discourse: Post-Holocaust Jewish Identity and the Scholem-Arendt Exchange
This article examines the significance of the private-public exchange of letters between Gershom Scholem and Hannah Arendt in the wake of the Eichmann trial. Using rhetorical analysis, it considers the respective arguments concerning Jewish responsibility, the incompatible political-moral frameworks...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2017
|
| Dans: |
European journal of jewish studies
Année: 2017, Volume: 11, Numéro: 1, Pages: 85-110 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Jewish Identity
Holocaust
Judaism
secularism
Hannah Arendt
Gershom Scholem
rhetorical analysis
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This article examines the significance of the private-public exchange of letters between Gershom Scholem and Hannah Arendt in the wake of the Eichmann trial. Using rhetorical analysis, it considers the respective arguments concerning Jewish responsibility, the incompatible political-moral frameworks offered to underpin such judgments, and the extreme identities the correspondents construct for each other. In doing so, it identifies the ultimate significance of the exchange with the total breakdown of discourse it symbolically resulted in—in other words, with the consensus pertaining to the Holocaust leading to a complete incommensurability of the respective political-moral positions. Such a state of affairs is finally accounted for, paradoxically, in terms of the far-reaching agreement between Arendt and Scholem, reaching beyond politics and even identity: the total inescapability of Jewishness. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1872-471X |
| Contient: | In: European journal of jewish studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/1872471X-12341297 |