Counter Argumentation against the Theory of Discrediting Hadith as Linguistic Evidence while Accepting the Authenticity of Anomalous Qiraʾat and Unknown Poetry (أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي)

Linguistic argumentation is defined by Arab grammarians to mean a formulation of grammatical rules from primary sources using anomaly, consensus, measurement, an argumentation based on circumstances and other rules. The anomaly sources are considered the most authentic references which are the holy...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yaacob, Solehah binti (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Arabic
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2016
In: Al-Bayān
Year: 2016, Volume: 14, Issue: 2, Pages: 223-246
Further subjects:B Al-Hadith delusion anomalous Qiraʾat argumentation authenticity poetry
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562038044
003 DE-627
005 20220604141914.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22321969-12340040  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562038044 
035 |a (DE-576)49203804X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ49203804X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng  |a ara 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Yaacob, Solehah binti  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Counter Argumentation against the Theory of Discrediting Hadith as Linguistic Evidence while Accepting the Authenticity of Anomalous Qiraʾat and Unknown Poetry (أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي) 
264 1 |c 2016 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Linguistic argumentation is defined by Arab grammarians to mean a formulation of grammatical rules from primary sources using anomaly, consensus, measurement, an argumentation based on circumstances and other rules. The anomaly sources are considered the most authentic references which are the holy Quran, Hadith al-Nabawi and Arabic poetry. This research aims to highlight the different views of Arab grammarians in devising the grammatical rules of the hadith. The authenticity of the Quran is indisputable as its verses are reliable and consistent. However, is there a difference between reliable reading and anomalous reading? Why are grammatical rules which are derived from anomalous Qiraʾat accepted, while the linguistic argumentations resulting from Hadith al-Nabawi are refuted? Why it is accepted in unknown poetry? And why are the argumentation from Quran and Arab poetry not merited and taken as evidence in linguistic argumentation? These questions are answered thoroughly by presenting the evidences and arguments from scholars in the field. An analytical study is being used as an approach to discuss the topic. 
601 |a Argumentation 
601 |a Linguistik 
601 |a authentes 
650 4 |a Al-Hadith  |x delusion  |x anomalous Qiraʾat  |x argumentation  |x authenticity  |x poetry 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Al-Bayān  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |g 14(2016), 2, Seite 223-246  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)828844771  |w (DE-600)2826075-2  |w (DE-576)434518492  |x 2232-1969  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2016  |g number:2  |g pages:223-246 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340040  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 14  |j 2016  |e 2  |h 223-246 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976894809 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562038044 
LOK |0 005 20170808151018 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL