Valuing Care Protects Religiosity from the Antisocial Consequences of Impersonal Deontology
Morality typically includes prosociality but often also extends to impersonal deontology. Religion, theoretically and empirically, is concerned with both moral domains. What happens when the two domains are in conflict? Do religious people prefer impersonal deontology at the detriment of prosocialit...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2016
|
| In: |
Journal of empirical theology
Year: 2016, Volume: 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 171-189 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religiosity
/ Morals
/ Deontology
/ Altruism
/ Conflict
|
| RelBib Classification: | AE Psychology of religion NCA Ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
Care
purity
deontology
consequentialism
morality
religiosity
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1562019708 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141824.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15709256-12341339 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1562019708 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)492019703 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492019703 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Deak, Csilla |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Valuing Care Protects Religiosity from the Antisocial Consequences of Impersonal Deontology |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Morality typically includes prosociality but often also extends to impersonal deontology. Religion, theoretically and empirically, is concerned with both moral domains. What happens when the two domains are in conflict? Do religious people prefer impersonal deontology at the detriment of prosociality? Or do their prosocial inclinations allow them to transgress conflicting moral principles, for instance through white lies? Participants (177 Belgian adults) made a choice in several hypothetical moral dilemmas and were afterwards evaluated on Haidt’s moral foundations (care, fairness, authority, loyalty, and purity) and religiosity. When the conflict implied minor consequences for the target, religiosity predicted impersonal deontology at the detriment of prosociality, because of a high endorsement of purity. However, when the consequences were severe, religiosity was unrelated to impersonal deontology due to a suppressor effect of care. The findings indicate that prosocial dispositions shape religiosity into a ‘compassionate moral rigorism’, thus protecting it from excessive moralism. | ||
| 601 | |a Deontologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Care |x purity |x deontology |x consequentialism |x morality |x religiosity | |
| 652 | |a AE:NCA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049428-7 |0 (DE-627)10618704X |0 (DE-576)209082011 |2 gnd |a Religiosität |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4040222-8 |0 (DE-627)104571780 |0 (DE-576)209038780 |2 gnd |a Moral |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4365723-0 |0 (DE-627)181383403 |0 (DE-576)211676764 |2 gnd |a Deontologie |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4129281-9 |0 (DE-627)105711012 |0 (DE-576)209609265 |2 gnd |a Altruismus |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4032081-9 |0 (DE-627)106262971 |0 (DE-576)208995544 |2 gnd |a Konflikt |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 700 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1043607102 |0 (DE-627)770710735 |0 (DE-576)177403691 |4 aut |a Saroglou, Vassilis | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of empirical theology |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1988 |g 29(2016), 2, Seite 171-189 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)389461652 |w (DE-600)2148912-9 |w (DE-576)112775764 |x 1570-9256 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:171-189 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341339 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 29 |j 2016 |e 2 |h 171-189 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 297687641X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1562019708 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180524144820 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043024 |a AE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Altruism,Care,Conflict,Conflict,Clash,Deontology,Morals,Morals,Religiosity |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Altruisme,Care,Sollicitude,Sollicitude,Conflit,Conflit,Déontologie,Morale,Morale,Religiosité |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Altruismo,Care,Cuidado,Cuidado,Conflicto,Conflicto,Deontología,Moral,Moral,Religiosidad |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Altruismo,Care,Conflitto,Conflitto,Deontologia,Morale,Morale,Religiosità |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 义务伦理学,冲突,冲突,纠纷,争执,纠纷,争执,利他主义,宗教性,道德,道德 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 利他主義,宗教性,義務倫理學,衝突,衝突,糾紛,爭執,糾紛,爭執,道德,道德 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Altruísmo,Care,Cuidado,Cuidado,Conflito,Conflito,Deontologia,Moral,Moral,Religiosidade |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Альтруизи,Деонтология,Конфликт (мотив),Конфликт,Мораль (мотив),Мораль,Религиозность,Этика заботы |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Care (ηθική),Ήθος (μοτίβο),Ήθος,Αλτρουϊσμός,Φιλαλληλία,Δεοντολογία,Θρησκευτικότητα,Σύγκρουση (μοτίβο),Σύγκρουση |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Religiösität,Religiösität , Konfliktdarstellung,Conflict,Konflikte |