A (Simple) Experimental Demonstration that Cultural Evolution is not Replicative, but Reconstructive — and an Explanation of Why this Difference Matters

Two complementary approaches to a naturalistic theory of culture are, on the one hand, mainstream cultural evolution research, and, on the other, work done under the banners of cultural attraction and the epidemiology of representations. There is much agreement between these two schools of thought,...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2017
Dans: Journal of cognition and culture
Année: 2017, Volume: 17, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 1-11
Sujets non-standardisés:B Culture cultural attraction cultural evolution evolutionary psychology
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1561952702
003 DE-627
005 20220604141527.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15685373-12342188  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1561952702 
035 |a (DE-576)491952708 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ491952708 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)1063079381  |0 (DE-627)809112930  |0 (DE-576)42042119X  |4 aut  |a Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. 
109 |a Scott-Phillips, Thomas C.  |a Phillips, Thomas C. Scott-  |a Scott-Phillips, Thom 
245 1 0 |a A (Simple) Experimental Demonstration that Cultural Evolution is not Replicative, but Reconstructive — and an Explanation of Why this Difference Matters 
264 1 |c 2017 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Two complementary approaches to a naturalistic theory of culture are, on the one hand, mainstream cultural evolution research, and, on the other, work done under the banners of cultural attraction and the epidemiology of representations. There is much agreement between these two schools of thought, including in particular a commitment to population thinking. Both schools also acknowledge that the propagation of culture is not simply a matter of replication, but rather one of reconstruction. However, the two schools of thought differ on the relative importance of this point. The cultural attraction school believes it to be fundamental to genuinely causal explanations of culture. In contrast, most mainstream cultural evolution thinking abstracts away from it. In this paper I make flesh a simple thought experiment (first proposed by Dan Sperber) that directly contrasts the effects that replication and reconstruction have on cultural items. Results demonstrate, in a simple and graphic way, that (i) normal cultural propagation is not replicative, but reconstructive, and (ii) that these two different modes of propagation afford two qualitatively different explanations of stability. If propagation is replicative, as it is in biology, then stability arises from the fidelity of that replication, and hence an explanation of stability comes from an explanation of how and why this high-fidelity is achieved. If, on the other hand, propagation is reconstructive (as it is in culture), then stability arises from the fact that a subclass of cultural types are easily re-producible, while others are not, and hence an explanation of stability comes from a description of what types are easily re-producible, and an explanation of why they are. I discuss two implications of this result for research at the intersection of evolution, cognition, and culture. 
601 |a Experiment 
601 |a Reconstruction 
601 |a Demonstration 
650 4 |a Culture  |x cultural attraction  |x cultural evolution  |x evolutionary psychology 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of cognition and culture  |d Leiden : Brill, 2001  |g 17(2017), 1/2, Seite 1-11  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)332952029  |w (DE-600)2055523-4  |w (DE-576)105430676  |x 1568-5373  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2017  |g number:1/2  |g pages:1-11 
856 |u https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/preview/1429964/16582.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342188  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 17  |j 2017  |e 1/2  |h 1-11 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976809100 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1561952702 
LOK |0 005 20170808150712 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL