Religious Rights versus Sexual Orientation Discrimination: A Fair Deal for Everyone
This article examines restrictions on the right to manifest one’s religion which are held to be justified for the protection of the rights of others, in particular, the right not to be discriminated against on the ground of one’s sexual orientation. Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom is scrutin...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2015
|
| In: |
Religion and human rights
Year: 2015, Volume: 10, Issue: 2, Pages: 128-159 |
| Further subjects: | B
Freedom Of Religion
non-discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation
freedom to resign
reasonable accommodation of religion
conscientious objection
Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1561889547 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141251.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/18710328-12341284 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1561889547 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)491889542 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ491889542 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)14040550X |0 (DE-627)618377085 |0 (DE-576)189384794 |4 aut |a Howard, Erica | |
| 109 | |a Howard, Erica | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious Rights versus Sexual Orientation Discrimination: A Fair Deal for Everyone |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article examines restrictions on the right to manifest one’s religion which are held to be justified for the protection of the rights of others, in particular, the right not to be discriminated against on the ground of one’s sexual orientation. Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom is scrutinised and it is argued that this suggests three possible ways of dealing with cases where an employee refuses to carry out certain parts of their job because of their religion or belief: using the “free to resign” rule; imposing a duty of reasonable accommodation on employers; and, providing for a conscientious objection exemption. These will be analysed with particular attention for their restrictions and limitations. This should lead to a conclusion as to whether these rights can be reconciled in a way that provides a fair deal for everyone. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Freedom Of Religion |x non-discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation |x freedom to resign |x reasonable accommodation of religion |x conscientious objection |x Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Religion and human rights |d Leiden : Brill, Nijhoff, 2006 |g 10(2015), 2, Seite 128-159 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)518818446 |w (DE-600)2254876-2 |w (DE-576)321221702 |x 1871-0328 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:128-159 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12341284 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 10 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 128-159 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976745285 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1561889547 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808150502 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||