The Impact of Religious and National Belonging on Attitudes Concerning the Social Importance of Religion

Culture and religion are both collective phenomena. Social identity theory shows how both can function as a connective frame of reference for a certain group of human beings. Frames are unique; nevertheless, different frames can overlap each other. In this research, both big categories will be used...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ziebertz, Hans-Georg 1956- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2017
In: Journal of empirical theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 30, Issue: 1, Pages: 41-67
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Religion / Importance / Nationality / Religious identity
RelBib Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
AE Psychology of religion
Further subjects:B Religious Institution religious belonging national culture cross-cultural research youth
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1561889156
003 DE-627
005 20220604141251.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15709256-12341347  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1561889156 
035 |a (DE-576)491889151 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ491889151 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)115526714  |0 (DE-627)077307534  |0 (DE-576)167335731  |4 aut  |a Ziebertz, Hans-Georg  |d 1956- 
109 |a Ziebertz, Hans-Georg 1956-  |a Ziebertz, Hans Georg 1956-  |a Ziebertz, Hans G. 1956- 
245 1 0 |a The Impact of Religious and National Belonging on Attitudes Concerning the Social Importance of Religion 
264 1 |c 2017 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Culture and religion are both collective phenomena. Social identity theory shows how both can function as a connective frame of reference for a certain group of human beings. Frames are unique; nevertheless, different frames can overlap each other. In this research, both big categories will be used to explore if and how they predict attitudes towards the social importance of religious institutions. Religious institutions are guided by religious authorities and these authorities have a specific responsibility to keep these institutions alive and prepare them for the future. In this research, respondents were asked how religious institutions can best be prepared for the future: whether they should use their social authority, moral authority, spiritual or cultural authority? The second and main question of this paper is: can the appreciated social importance of religious institutions be predicted by religious or non-religious reasons, i.e. by either respondents’ religious belonging or their national identity? A requirement for such research is the availability of a cross-cultural and cross-religious sample. In this paper, data were taken from the “Religion and Human Rights” programme and respondents from 14 countries (N=13.004) were included in the analysis. The findings show that respondents regard the social importance of religion differently and that differences depend on respondents’ country of citizenship and their religious belonging. If the weight of these influences is compared, respondents’ views are more strongly predicted by their national than by their religious belonging. The findings also show that there is an overlap between national culture and religion, which explains a certain percentage of the variance. 
650 4 |a Religious Institution  |x religious belonging  |x national culture  |x cross-cultural research  |x youth 
652 |a AD:AE 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049396-9  |0 (DE-627)106187155  |0 (DE-576)209081880  |2 gnd  |a Religion 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4706879-6  |0 (DE-627)356530191  |0 (DE-576)215424433  |2 gnd  |a Wichtigkeit 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4171217-1  |0 (DE-627)104105453  |0 (DE-576)20993557X  |2 gnd  |a Nationalität 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4354651-1  |0 (DE-627)181259605  |0 (DE-576)211562815  |2 gnd  |a Religiöse Identität 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of empirical theology  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1988  |g 30(2017), 1, Seite 41-67  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)389461652  |w (DE-600)2148912-9  |w (DE-576)112775764  |x 1570-9256  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:41-67 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341347  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 30  |j 2017  |e 1  |h 41-67 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976744882 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1561889156 
LOK |0 005 20180524154853 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043016  |a AD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043024  |a AE 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Importance,Significance,Significance,Nationality,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature,Religious identity,Religious identity,Identity 
STB 0 0 |a Identité religieuse,Identité religieuse,Importance,Nationalité,Religion,Religions,Religion 
STC 0 0 |a Identidad religiosa,Identidad religiosa,Importancia,Nacionalidad,Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Identità religiosa,Identità religiosa,Importanza,Nazionalità,Religione,Religione,Religione 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,宗教身份,宗教认同 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,宗教身份,宗教認同 
STG 0 0 |a Identidade religiosa,Identidade religiosa,Importância,Nacionalidade,Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Важность,Национальность,Религиозная личность (мотив),Религиозное сознание,Религия (мотив),Религия 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Θρησκευτική ταυτότητα (μοτίβο),Θρησκευτική ταυτότητα,Ιθαγένεια,Σπουδαιότητα,Σημασία 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Bedeutsamkeit,Relevanz , Religiöses Bewusstsein