Kingship and Carpe Diem, Between Gilgamesh and Qoheleth

The comparison of Qoheleth and Gilgamesh begins with the so-called carpe diem advice of Siduri and Eccl 9:7-9. Additionally, the rhetoric of kingship evoked through Gilgamesh’s narû (“stele”) at the beginning of the epic parallels the royal voice of Qoheleth beginning in Eccl 1:12. Yet these similar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vetus Testamentum
1. VerfasserIn: Suriano, Matthew J.
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Veröffentlicht: Brill 2017
In: Vetus Testamentum
Jahr: 2017, Band: 67, Heft: 2, Seiten: 285-306
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Bibel. Kohelet / Gilgamesch-Epos / König / Carpe diem
RelBib Classification:BC Altorientalische Religionen
HB Altes Testament
VA Philosophie
ZC Politik
weitere Schlagwörter:B Gilgamesh Ecclesiastes kingship royal inscriptions
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallele Ausgabe:Nicht-Elektronisch
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The comparison of Qoheleth and Gilgamesh begins with the so-called carpe diem advice of Siduri and Eccl 9:7-9. Additionally, the rhetoric of kingship evoked through Gilgamesh’s narû (“stele”) at the beginning of the epic parallels the royal voice of Qoheleth beginning in Eccl 1:12. Yet these similarities raise several historical issues. First, Siduri’s speech is only found in an Old Babylonian fragment of the epic. The redaction of this advice was part of a process of adapting kingship motifs in the Standard Babylonian Epic. This process appears to bring Gilgamesh closer to Qoheleth, particularly in its reference to narû literature. But in reality the message of later versions of the Mesopotamian epic diverges from that of Ecclesiastes. Furthermore, Qoheleth’s royal voice finds a closer parallel in Northwest Semitic memorial inscriptions. A careful reconsideration of these factors will show that the similarities and differences reflect how both works interact with kingship.
ISSN:1568-5330
Enthält:In: Vetus Testamentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685330-12341276