A Rejoinder to “Justice, That Fraught Idea,” by Martin Kavka and Russell McCutcheon
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the American Academy of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comMARTIN KAVKA AND RUSSELL MCCUTCHEON (“our critics”) only want to assist (even though it borders on the supercilious...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Oxford University Press
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Année: 2017, Volume: 85, Numéro: 1, Pages: 255-260 |
| RelBib Classification: | BJ Islam |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the American Academy of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comMARTIN KAVKA AND RUSSELL MCCUTCHEON (“our critics”) only want to assist (even though it borders on the supercilious) in maintaining the boundaries of what they deem to be acceptable academic discourse. They raise many issues, but due to limited space, we respond to only three: (1) the form of their response and our article’s aim; (2) the notion of “justice” and its relation to the aims in the final section of our article, which particularly evoked the annoyance of our critics; and (3) the intersection of academic discourse and advocacy.Our critics deliberately foreground form over content, thereby setting up a predetermined framework with which to view the content of our article based on their strong—and contradictory—views on how religion studies should be “properly” done.... |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4585 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "Justice, That Fraught Idea (2017)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: American Academy of Religion, Journal of the American Academy of Religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfw089 |