A Rejoinder to “Justice, That Fraught Idea,” by Martin Kavka and Russell McCutcheon

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the American Academy of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comMARTIN KAVKA AND RUSSELL MCCUTCHEON (“our critics”) only want to assist (even though it borders on the supercilious...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Esack, Farid 1956- (Author) ; Mahomed, Nadeem (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press [2017]
In: Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 85, Issue: 1, Pages: 255-260
RelBib Classification:BJ Islam
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1561040134
003 DE-627
005 20200309145121.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170720s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jaarel/lfw089  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1561040134 
035 |a (DE-576)49104013X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ49104013X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)143114514  |0 (DE-627)704393417  |0 (DE-576)17651614X  |4 aut  |a Esack, Farid  |d 1956- 
109 |a Esack, Farid 1956-  |a Esack, Maulana Farid 1956-  |a Esack, Maulana F. 1956- 
245 1 2 |a A Rejoinder to “Justice, That Fraught Idea,” by Martin Kavka and Russell McCutcheon  |c Farid Esack 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the American Academy of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comMARTIN KAVKA AND RUSSELL MCCUTCHEON (“our critics”) only want to assist (even though it borders on the supercilious) in maintaining the boundaries of what they deem to be acceptable academic discourse. They raise many issues, but due to limited space, we respond to only three: (1) the form of their response and our article’s aim; (2) the notion of “justice” and its relation to the aims in the final section of our article, which particularly evoked the annoyance of our critics; and (3) the intersection of academic discourse and advocacy.Our critics deliberately foreground form over content, thereby setting up a predetermined framework with which to view the content of our article based on their strong—and contradictory—views on how religion studies should be “properly” done.... 
652 |a BJ 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1068288078  |0 (DE-627)820020478  |0 (DE-576)421049901  |4 aut  |a Mahomed, Nadeem 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a American Academy of Religion  |t Journal of the American Academy of Religion  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1967  |g 85(2017), 1, Seite 255-260  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)338767819  |w (DE-600)2064642-2  |w (DE-576)10686971X  |x 1477-4585  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:85  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:255-260 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Kavka, Martin  |t Justice, That Fraught Idea  |d 2017  |w (DE-627)1561039918  |w (DE-576)491039913 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jaar/article/85/1/255/3097868/A-Rejoinder-to-Justice-That-Fraught-Idea-by-Martin  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfw089  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 85  |j 2017  |e 1  |h 255-260 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2974569153 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1561040134 
LOK |0 005 20191126175820 
LOK |0 008 170720||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043539  |a BJ 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL