Furnishing the Skill Which Can Save the Child: Diphtheria, Germ Theory, and Theodicy
Amid the diverse ways men and women have viewed the relationship between science and religion, explicit arguments that “Science is God's Provision” remain unexamined by historians. Such arguments are examined here as they relate to the problem of theodicy, by looking at a particular case study...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
Dans: |
Zygon
Année: 2017, Volume: 52, Numéro: 2, Pages: 296-322 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Religion
/ Natural sciences
/ Medicine
/ Theodicy
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion AD Sociologie des religions CF Christianisme et science |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Medicine
B Natural Evil B Theodicy B Natural Theology B diphtheria B Cancer |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | Amid the diverse ways men and women have viewed the relationship between science and religion, explicit arguments that “Science is God's Provision” remain unexamined by historians. Such arguments are examined here as they relate to the problem of theodicy, by looking at a particular case study that inspired comments on the relationship between medicine and faith, namely, the discovery of the diphtheria antitoxin. This story highlights, first, the flexibility of the tradition of natural theology, and second, the important role the problem of theodicy has played in the history of the relationship between science and religion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12335 |