The Proximity of Hippo to Harvard: A Very Belated Reply to Gilbert Meilaender

In response to Meilaender’s critique of my earlier work, I argue that Rawlsian and Augustinian ‘liberalisms’ are closer in spirit than Meilaender allows. Rawlsians and Augustinians can agree that the concern to preserve temporal peace under modern pluralistic conditions affords a warrant for politic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Santurri, Edmund N. 1950- (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Meilaender, Gilbert 1946- (VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Sage [2017]
In: Studies in Christian ethics
Jahr: 2017, Band: 30, Heft: 2, Seiten: 179-188
RelBib Classification:KAB Kirchengeschichte 30-500; Frühchristentum
KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit
NCD Politische Ethik
TK Neueste Zeit
weitere Schlagwörter:B Augustine
B articles of peace
B public reason
B liberal neutrality
B Political Liberalism
B Bioethics
B AUGUSTINIAN missions
B Meilaender, Gilbert
B First Amendment
B religion clauses
B Peace
B Religious Freedom
B God
B John Courtney Murray
B Meilaender
B Rawls
B Augustinians
B equal liberty of conscience
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In response to Meilaender’s critique of my earlier work, I argue that Rawlsian and Augustinian ‘liberalisms’ are closer in spirit than Meilaender allows. Rawlsians and Augustinians can agree that the concern to preserve temporal peace under modern pluralistic conditions affords a warrant for political arrangements that require allegiance to no particular all-encompassing world view. This agreement on a certain kind of political neutrality extends to constitutional essentials but does not prohibit appeals to particular comprehensive visions in political debate so long as such appeals are consistent with maintaining the social peace that liberal institutions are designed to preserve.
ISSN:0953-9468
Bezug:Kritik in "Friendly Rejoinders (2017)"
Enthält:Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0953946816684446