Doing, allowing, and the problem of evil

Many assume that the best, and perhaps only, way to address the so-called Problem of Evil (PoE) is to claim that God does not do evil, but that God merely allows evil. This assumption depends on two claims: (i) the doing-allowing distinction exists and (ii) the doing-allowing distinction is morally...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Lim, Daniel (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2017]
Dans: International journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2017, Volume: 81, Numéro: 3, Pages: 273-289
Sujets non-standardisés:B Burial
B Allowing
B Doing
B GOOD & evil
B Theodicy
B problem of evil
B DISTINCTION (Philosophy)
B Kantian ethics
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1559355603
003 DE-627
005 20221110132748.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170601s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-016-9569-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1559355603 
035 |a (DE-576)489355609 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ489355609 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042550247  |0 (DE-627)769104150  |0 (DE-576)394027167  |4 aut  |a Lim, Daniel 
109 |a Lim, Daniel 
245 1 0 |a Doing, allowing, and the problem of evil  |c Daniel Lim 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Many assume that the best, and perhaps only, way to address the so-called Problem of Evil (PoE) is to claim that God does not do evil, but that God merely allows evil. This assumption depends on two claims: (i) the doing-allowing distinction exists and (ii) the doing-allowing distinction is morally significant. In this paper I try to undermine both of these claims. Against (i) I argue that some of the most influential analyses of the doing-allowing distinction face grave difficulties and that these difficulties are only exacerbated when applied to God. Against (ii) I argue that broadly Kantian considerations give a better explanation of the moral differences in paradigm cases than the doing-allowing distinction and, when applied to God, effectively dissolve the moral significance of the doing-allowing distinction. The upshot of this is that those who claim God does evil are no worse off than those who claim God allows evil regarding the PoE. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Allowing 
650 4 |a Burial 
650 4 |a DISTINCTION (Philosophy) 
650 4 |a Doing 
650 4 |a GOOD & evil 
650 4 |a Kantian ethics 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 81(2017), 3, Seite 273-289  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:81  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:273-289 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-016-9569-y  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 81  |j 2017  |e 3  |h 273-289 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 297085466X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1559355603 
LOK |0 005 20170601170627 
LOK |0 008 170601||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL