Institutional, Alternative, Distanced, and Secular.: Four Types of (Un)Belief and their Gods
When scholars use mono-method strategies to identify broad religious or secular groups in a population, they often encounter significant problems. Quantitative studies have difficulties in interpreting the groups because of a lack of local knowledge, while qualitative studies often lack generalizabi...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Universitetsforlaget
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Nordic journal of religion and society
Année: 2017, Volume: 30, Numéro: 1, Pages: 4-23 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Spiritualité
/ Laïcité
/ Foi
/ Incroyance
/ Institutionnalisation
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AG Vie religieuse |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Secularity
B Spirituality B Religious milieu B fuzzy fidelity B Mixed Methods B God B Religiosity |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | When scholars use mono-method strategies to identify broad religious or secular groups in a population, they often encounter significant problems. Quantitative studies have difficulties in interpreting the groups because of a lack of local knowledge, while qualitative studies often lack generalizability. The present study uses a mixed methods approach combining a representative survey (N=1229) and semi-structured interviews (N=73) to better address these problems. I identify four basic types of (un)belief: Institutionals, Alternatives, Distanced, and Seculars. These types show very different religious/secular beliefs and practices, and significantly differing images of “God.” I argue that this typology is more complete than former attempts, since it combines quantitative generalizability with interpretation grounded in qualitative material. An intergenerational perspective shows that the growing “secular” group will, in the future, outnumber the current largest group of “distanced” individuals. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1890-7008 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Nordic journal of religion and society
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.18261/issn.1890-7008-2017-01-01 |