Liberalism, Post-liberalism and the Fact-Value Divide
Jewish and Christian thought of the modern and contemporary period is frequently described as either liberal or post-liberal. In lieu of this widely accepted categorization, this essay narrates developments in modern and contemporary Jewish and Christian thought in wake of the impact of the fact-val...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
Dans: |
Modern theology
Année: 2017, Volume: 33, Numéro: 1, Pages: 140-162 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804
/ Rosenzweig, Franz 1886-1929
/ Fait
/ Valeur
/ Dichotomie
/ Judaïsme
/ Christianisme
|
RelBib Classification: | BH Judaïsme CA Christianisme KAH Époque moderne KAJ Époque contemporaine VB Herméneutique; philosophie |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | Jewish and Christian thought of the modern and contemporary period is frequently described as either liberal or post-liberal. In lieu of this widely accepted categorization, this essay narrates developments in modern and contemporary Jewish and Christian thought in wake of the impact of the fact-value dichotomy on theological and ethical discourse. This essay demonstrates the negative ramifications of this logical distinction on Jewish and Christian thought and shows how these negative repercussions can stimulate an immanent critique of this logic and a new paradigm in Jewish and Christian thinking. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1468-0025 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Modern theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/moth.12307 |