Can Science and Religion Respond to Climate Change?
With the challenge of communicating climate science in the United States and making progress in international negotiations on climate change there is a need for other approaches. The moral issues of ecological degradation and climate justice need to be integrated into social consciousness, political...
| Publié dans: | Zygon |
|---|---|
| Autres titres: | Why do we disagree on climate change? |
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2015]
|
| Dans: |
Zygon
Année: 2015, Volume: 50, Numéro: 4, Pages: 949-961 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Earth Charter
B intergenerational justice B Ecosystems B Global Ethics B Climate Change B Renewable energy B American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) B Sustainability B Technology transfer B Precautionary Principle B Flourishing B fairness doctrine B Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | With the challenge of communicating climate science in the United States and making progress in international negotiations on climate change there is a need for other approaches. The moral issues of ecological degradation and climate justice need to be integrated into social consciousness, political legislation, and climate treaties. Both science and religion can contribute to this integration with differentiated language but shared purpose. Recognizing the limits of both science and religion is critical to finding a way forward for addressing the critical challenges of climate change. How we value nature and human-Earth relations is crucial to this. We need a broader environmental ethics in dialogue with the science of climate change. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12221 |