Can Science and Religion Respond to Climate Change?

With the challenge of communicating climate science in the United States and making progress in international negotiations on climate change there is a need for other approaches. The moral issues of ecological degradation and climate justice need to be integrated into social consciousness, political...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zygon
Subtitles:Why do we disagree on climate change?
Main Author: Tucker, Mary Evelyn 1949- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2015]
In: Zygon
Year: 2015, Volume: 50, Issue: 4, Pages: 949-961
Further subjects:B Earth Charter
B intergenerational justice
B Ecosystems
B Global Ethics
B Climate Change
B Renewable energy
B American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
B Sustainability
B Technology transfer
B Precautionary Principle
B Flourishing
B fairness doctrine
B Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1555086799
003 DE-627
005 20170314120525.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170308s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/zygo.12221  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1555086799 
035 |a (DE-576)485086794 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ485086794 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)172422388  |0 (DE-627)697363163  |0 (DE-576)166088331  |4 aut  |a Tucker, Mary Evelyn  |d 1949- 
109 |a Tucker, Mary Evelyn 1949-  |a Tucker, Mary E. 1949- 
245 1 0 |a Can Science and Religion Respond to Climate Change?  |c Mary Evelyn Tucker 
246 1 |i Rubrikentitel  |a Why do we disagree on climate change? 
264 1 |c [2015] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a With the challenge of communicating climate science in the United States and making progress in international negotiations on climate change there is a need for other approaches. The moral issues of ecological degradation and climate justice need to be integrated into social consciousness, political legislation, and climate treaties. Both science and religion can contribute to this integration with differentiated language but shared purpose. Recognizing the limits of both science and religion is critical to finding a way forward for addressing the critical challenges of climate change. How we value nature and human-Earth relations is crucial to this. We need a broader environmental ethics in dialogue with the science of climate change. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 
650 4 |a Climate Change 
650 4 |a Earth Charter 
650 4 |a Ecosystems 
650 4 |a fairness doctrine 
650 4 |a Flourishing 
650 4 |a Global Ethics 
650 4 |a intergenerational justice 
650 4 |a Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 
650 4 |a Precautionary Principle 
650 4 |a Renewable energy 
650 4 |a Sustainability 
650 4 |a Technology transfer 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 50(2015), 4, Seite 949-961  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:50  |g year:2015  |g number:4  |g pages:949-961 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12221  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 50  |j 2015  |e 4  |h 949-961 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2958234479 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1555086799 
LOK |0 005 20170308104654 
LOK |0 008 170308||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Aufblühen