Climate Change and the Apocalyptic Imagination: Science, Faith, and Ecological Responsibility

The use of apocalyptic and post apocalyptic narratives to interpret the risk of environmental degradation and climate change has been criticized for (1) too often making erroneous predictions on the basis of too little evidence, (2) being ineffective to motivate change, (3) leading to a discounting...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Zygon
Autres titres:Why do we disagree on climate change?
Auteur principal: Moo, Jonathan (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2015]
Dans: Zygon
Sujets non-standardisés:B Book of Revelation
B Climate Change
B ecomodernism
B Apocalypse
B Environnement (art)
B Ecology
B Christianity
B Hope
Accès en ligne: Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:The use of apocalyptic and post apocalyptic narratives to interpret the risk of environmental degradation and climate change has been criticized for (1) too often making erroneous predictions on the basis of too little evidence, (2) being ineffective to motivate change, (3) leading to a discounting of present needs in the face of an exaggerated threat of impending catastrophe, and (4) relying on a pre-modern, Judeo-Christian mode of constructing reality. Nevertheless, “Apocalypse,” whether understood in its technical sense as “revelation” or in its popular sense as “end of the world as we know it,” remains a powerful way of creatively reimagining the world and of introducing questions of value and significance into discussions of climate change.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contient:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12222