Pilgrim or tourist? Modelling two types of travel bloggers

The typological distinction between pilgrims and tourists has often been drawn in tourism studies. This article aims at complementing this debate by applying computational techniques to analyse discourses in a corpus of blogs from the Dutch travel blog repository of waarbenjij.nu. The hypothesis is...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Van Nuenen, Tom (Auteur) ; Beek, Suzanne van der 1988- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Heidelberg University Publishing 2016
Dans: Online - Heidelberg journal of religions on the internet
Année: 2016, Volume: 11, Pages: 138-163
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Voyage / Blogueur / Pèlerinage / Tourisme
Sujets non-standardisés:B computational methods
B tourist
B Pilgrim
B topic modelling
B Identity
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:The typological distinction between pilgrims and tourists has often been drawn in tourism studies. This article aims at complementing this debate by applying computational techniques to analyse discourses in a corpus of blogs from the Dutch travel blog repository of waarbenjij.nu. The hypothesis is that pilgrims and tourists share notable similarities in their identity narratives. Several unsupervised computational methods are leveraged to analyse the corpora; they provide a cue for further interpretation, which relies on a directed close reading of indicated keywords. The analysis shows that pilgrims, instead of writing about sacred topics, focus on the same practical topics that tourists are invested in. Conversely, tourists show a notable sensibility to a range of highly valued, set apart experiences. The paper ends with the proposal for a new continuum to understand the distinction between pilgrims andtourists, based on the difference between condensed diversity and extended engagement.
ISSN:1861-5813
Contient:Enthalten in: Online - Heidelberg journal of religions on the internet
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.17885/heiup.rel.2016.0.23631
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heiup-rel-236313