Religious competition: is it a useful concept?
In recent years ‘competition’ has become an ever more popular concept in the study of ancient religions. Or should that be a label? Innovative concept or mere label: to come to a decision, we should ask some questions. What are the studies that advertise themselves as dealing with competition about,...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
Entangled Religions
Année: 2016, Volume: 3, Pages: [146-166] |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Religious competition in the third century CE
/ Roman Empire
/ Religious pluralism
/ Competition
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions BE Religion gréco-romaine |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Competition
B Marketplace B Conflict B Rivalry B Contestation |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | In recent years ‘competition’ has become an ever more popular concept in the study of ancient religions. Or should that be a label? Innovative concept or mere label: to come to a decision, we should ask some questions. What are the studies that advertise themselves as dealing with competition about, what do people understand by it? Does competition do what it should be doing: provide some new interpretative framework, and, in the case of edited volumes, tie the different contributions together? In order to answer these questions, a fairly recently published volume (Rosenblum, Vuong & DesRosiers, 2014) will be analyzed in some detail and compared to some other publications that cover (or seem to cover) the same ground. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2363-6696 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Entangled Religions
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13154/er.v3.2016.BJ-CC |