Scorning the Image of Virtue

There survives an extraordinary letter of 1616 by the prominent English stage player, Nathan Field. His missive is one of the only extant apologies for the theater written by a player. Field’s letter is a response to a sermon preached by Thomas Sutton, and it richly characterizes Field’s relationshi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McKee, Patricia J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2016
In: Religion and the arts
Year: 2016, Volume: 20, Issue: 3, Pages: 267-289
Further subjects:B Church History early modern sermon antitheatricalism English Renaissance theater Reformation iconoclasm Elizabethan actors Nathan Field
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1548784834
003 DE-627
005 20220604130152.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 161027s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15685292-02003001  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1548784834 
035 |a (DE-576)47878483X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ47878483X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a McKee, Patricia J.  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Scorning the Image of Virtue 
264 1 |c 2016 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a There survives an extraordinary letter of 1616 by the prominent English stage player, Nathan Field. His missive is one of the only extant apologies for the theater written by a player. Field’s letter is a response to a sermon preached by Thomas Sutton, and it richly characterizes Field’s relationship to his parish and to the larger ecclesial powers. This discussion shows how Field ironically employs the very charges often levied by opponents of theater—deception, emotional indulgence, and idolatry—to indict Sutton for a public attack he wielded against Field from the Sunday pulpit. Field’s apology is read within the context of the era’s antitheatricalist polemics, Jacobean politics, Reformation theology, and Field’s history as the son of a radical puritan preacher. The letter invites deep consideration of church and theater—preaching and playing—as competing kinds of performance. Field’s apology also focuses attention on a neglected area in theater studies—the history of players and playing in early modernity. What was an actor’s idea of himself at a time when his profession was redefined by religious reforms? Further, this discussion offers preliminary suggestions for an early modern aesthetics of performance by inviting a dialogue between the era’s extreme antitheatricalism and concurrent prescriptions for effective oratory. 
650 4 |a Church History  |x early modern sermon  |x antitheatricalism  |x English Renaissance theater  |x Reformation iconoclasm  |x Elizabethan actors  |x Nathan Field 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Religion and the arts  |d Leiden : Brill, 1996  |g 20(2016), 3, Seite 267-289  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331747022  |w (DE-600)2052614-3  |w (DE-576)09448175X  |x 1568-5292  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g pages:267-289 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685292-02003001  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 20  |j 2016  |e 3  |h 267-289 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2942338466 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1548784834 
LOK |0 005 20170808153453 
LOK |0 008 161027||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL