Towards a “Redescription” of “Spirituality”: A Response
In “The Spiritual Illusion” (2014), Jonathan R. Herman wishes to initiate a discussion of the feasibility of the category “spirituality” within the study of religions. This response addresses several methodological problems with his effort, and questions the feasibility of this ironic approach. My c...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2015
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 27, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 475-488 |
| Further subjects: | B
Spirituality
spirituality distinction / religion
theology
outsider / insider
methodology
semantic history / conceptual
genealogy
sbnr
|
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1539676153 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604122556.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160517s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15700682-12341350 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1539676153 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)469676159 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ469676159 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Melvær, Knut Mordal |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Towards a “Redescription” of “Spirituality”: A Response |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In “The Spiritual Illusion” (2014), Jonathan R. Herman wishes to initiate a discussion of the feasibility of the category “spirituality” within the study of religions. This response addresses several methodological problems with his effort, and questions the feasibility of this ironic approach. My critique is five-folded: Firstly, Herman draws a crude picture of the relationship between theology and the study of religion. Secondly, he does not explain why his sample of authors constitutes a hegemony for the understanding of “spirituality” in the study of religions. Thirdly, he ignores those who have been influential for how the category is used today. Fourthly, religion is assumed to be a “rectified” category not worthy of discussion. Fifthly, it remains unclear where an “ironic” and “imaginative” comparison of spiritual\religion and penis\vagina will take us. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Spirituality |x religion/spirituality distinction |x theology |x insider/outsider |x methodology |x conceptual/semantic history |x genealogy |x sbnr | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Method & theory in the study of religion |d Leiden : Brill, 1989 |g 27(2015), 4/5, Seite 475-488 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)34189656X |w (DE-600)2069397-7 |w (DE-576)100668399 |x 1570-0682 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2015 |g number:4/5 |g pages:475-488 |
| 856 | |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/mtsr/27/4-5/article-p475_8.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341350 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 27 |j 2015 |e 4/5 |h 475-488 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2924776783 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1539676153 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808152717 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||