When Acceptance Reflects Disrespect
The late Hans Penner critiqued the Phenomenology of Religion 25 years ago for confusing the subject and its object. His critique remains relevant to contemporary methods that accept participant statements uncritically. Beginning with a detailed analysis of one lived religion article and expanding to...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2015
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 27, Issue: 1, Pages: 59-81 |
| Further subjects: | B
Lived Religion
methodology
epistemology
interviews
phenomenology
experience
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1539655989 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604122555.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160517s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15700682-12341324 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1539655989 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)469655984 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ469655984 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1100360409 |0 (DE-627)859319695 |0 (DE-576)420631216 |4 aut |a Ramey, Steven W. | |
| 109 | |a Ramey, Steven W. |a Ramey, Steven |a Ramey, Steven Wesley | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a When Acceptance Reflects Disrespect |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The late Hans Penner critiqued the Phenomenology of Religion 25 years ago for confusing the subject and its object. His critique remains relevant to contemporary methods that accept participant statements uncritically. Beginning with a detailed analysis of one lived religion article and expanding to a broader critique, this essay illustrates the contradictions that remain in lived religion methodologies and similar approaches to the study of religion. While reflecting respect for practitioners and expanding the concept of religion, these methods ignore the agency of participants to represent themselves strategically and reinforce common discourse on religion, only expanding the category at its safe margins. The agendas that drive various studies work at cross purposes because of the inherent contradictions, and the dichotomy between scholars (and people like scholars) and practitioners that often results contradicts the rhetoric of respect and treating everyone equally. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Lived Religion |x methodology |x epistemology |x interviews |x phenomenology |x experience | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Method & theory in the study of religion |d Leiden : Brill, 1989 |g 27(2015), 1, Seite 59-81 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)34189656X |w (DE-600)2069397-7 |w (DE-576)100668399 |x 1570-0682 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:59-81 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341324 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 27 |j 2015 |e 1 |h 59-81 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 292465730X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1539655989 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808152549 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||