"Ethos" and "Logos": A Second-Century Debate Between “Pagan” and Christian Philosophers
This essay analyses the most significant sources—some overlooked so far—on the debate on ethos and logos that was lively between “pagan” and Christian philosophers in the second century ce. Epictetus’s attribution of a behaviour based on ethos to the Christians should not be regarded as utterly nega...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2015
|
| Dans: |
Vigiliae Christianae
Année: 2015, Volume: 69, Numéro: 2, Pages: 123-156 |
| RelBib Classification: | KAB Christianisme primitif NBF Christologie NCA Éthique VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Ethos
logos
Epictetus
Musonius
Lucian
Galen
Celsus
Marcus Aurelius
Montanism
Syriac apology to Marcus Aurelius
Justin
Bardaisan
Clement of Alexandria
Origen
Gregory Nazianzen
Logos theology
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This essay analyses the most significant sources—some overlooked so far—on the debate on ethos and logos that was lively between “pagan” and Christian philosophers in the second century ce. Epictetus’s attribution of a behaviour based on ethos to the Christians should not be regarded as utterly negative, but should rather be connected with his teacher Musonius’s high appreciation of ethos, even over logos. Marcus Aurelius’s and Celsus’s negative attitude toward Christianity as an obstinate, irrational habit can be explained by the possible influence of Montanism, while the Syriac apology to Marcus ascribed to Melito reacts to anti-Christian accusations of irrationality by attaching logos to the Christians and a behaviour based on a bad ethos to “paganism”—the same as was done by Clement of Alexandria, one of the Christian intellectuals most committed to demonstrating the rationality of Christian belief. Literary problems related to the apology are tackled, and parallels are pointed out with both Justin and Bardaisan, two other Christian Platonists who attempted to construe Christianity as philosophy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0720 |
| Contient: | In: Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341205 |